WY · rules
W.R.C.P.C.C. 1
Scope
The purpose of these rules is to provide maximum access to the Wyoming
circuit courts in civil actions; to enhance the provision of just, speedy, and
inexpensive determination of civil actions; to provide expedited trial dates; and
to focus discovery towards resolution of the issues. These simplified rules
should be construed and administered to secure the advantages of simplified
procedure as provided herein. Extensions, continuances, and stays are
strongly disfavored.
At all times, the court and the parties must address the action in ways
designed to assure that the process and the costs are proportionate to the
amount in controversy and the complexity and importance of the issues. The
factors to be considered by the court in making a proportionality assessment
include, without limitation: needs of the case, amount in controversy, parties’
resources, and complexity and importance of the issues at stake in the
litigation. This proportionality rule is fully applicable to every aspect of these
Rules.
Comment:
The idea of proportionality is to reverse the default understanding that
parties are entitled to discovery of all facts without limit unless and until a
court says otherwise, because the monetary and time costs of unlimited
discovery reduce access to justice. It is the purpose of this rule to make clear that
all facts are not necessarily subject to discovery. Rather, all pre-trial activities
must focus on the facts required to appropriately resolve the particular dispute.
Provenance
- Source
- wyocourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e48dfe7778c38610c471936f2b221dcf974eef374df899116caa6ba80359982b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.