WY · rules
W.R.C.P. 8
General Rules of Pleading
(a) Claims for Relief. — A pleading that states a claim for relief must
contain:
(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction,
unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new
jurisdictional support;
(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is
entitled to relief; and
(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the
alternative or different types of relief.
(b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials. —
(1) In General. — In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted
against it; and
(B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing
party.
(2) Denials — Responding to the Substance. — A denial must fairly
respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. — A party that intends in good faith to
deny all the allegations of a pleading — including the jurisdictional grounds
— may do so by a general denial subject to the obligations set forth in Rule
11. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either
specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those
specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. — A party that intends in good faith to
deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the
rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. — A party that lacks knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must
so state, and the statement has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. — An allegation — other than one relating to
the amount of damages — is admitted if a responsive pleading is required
and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required, an
allegation is considered denied or avoided.
(c) Affirmative Defenses. —
(1) In General. — In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively
state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including:
accord and satisfaction;
arbitration and award;
assumption of risk;
contributory negligence;
duress;
estoppel;
failure of consideration;
fraud;
illegality;
injury by fellow servant;
laches;
license;
payment;
release;
res judicata;
statute of frauds;
statute of limitations; and
waiver.
(2) Mistaken Designation. — If a party mistakenly designates a defense
as a counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice
requires, treat the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may
impose terms for doing so.
discharge in bankruptcy;
(d) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Alternative Statements; Inconsistency.
—
(1) In General. — Each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct. No
technical form is required.
(2) Alternative Statements of a Claim or Defense. — A party may set out
two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically,
either in a single count or defense or in separate ones. If a party makes
alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is
sufficient.
(3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses. — A party may state as many
separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency.
(e) Construing Pleadings. — Pleadings must be construed so as to do justice.
History
History: Added February 2, 2017, effective March 1, 2017.
Provenance
- Source
- wyocourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
b0de639b8a2caaed68d6fed2028b8f0b8e1801dc670fb88a1afb1236ecbb7260
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.