Bindinglaw

WY · rules

W.R.C.P. 33

Interrogatories to Parties

activein force · 2017-03-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) In General. —

(1) Number. — Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a

party may serve on any other party no more than 25 written interrogatories,

including all discrete subparts. Leave to serve additional interrogatories

may be granted to the extent consistent with Rule 26(b)(1) and (2).

(2) Scope. — An interrogatory may relate to any matter that may be

inquired into under Rule 26(b). An interrogatory is not objectionable merely

because it asks for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the

application of law to fact, but the court may order that the interrogatory

need not be answered until designated discovery is complete, or until a

pretrial conference or some other time.

(b) Answers and Objections. —

(1) Responding Party. — The interrogatories must be answered:

(A) by the party to whom they are directed; or

(B) if that party is a public or private corporation, a partnership, an

association, or a governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who must

furnish the information available to the party.

(2) Time to Respond. — The responding party must serve its answers and

any objections within 30 days after being served with the interrogatories. A

shorter or longer time may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be ordered by

the court.

(3) Answering Each Interrogatory. — Each interrogatory must, to the

extent it is not objected to, be answered separately and fully in writing under

oath.

(4) Objections. — The grounds for objecting to an interrogatory must be

stated with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived

unless the court, for good cause, excuses the failure.

(5) Signature. — The person who makes the answers must sign them, and

the attorney who objects must sign any objections.

(c) Use. — An answer to an interrogatory may be used to the extent allowed

by the Wyoming Rules of Evidence.

(d) Option to Produce Business Records. — If the answer to an interrogatory

may be determined by examining, auditing, compiling, abstracting, or sum-

marizing a party’s business records (including electronically stored information), and if the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer will be

substantially the same for either party, the responding party may answer by:

(1) specifying the records that must be reviewed, in sufficient detail to

enable the interrogating party to locate and identify them as readily as the

responding party could; and

(2) giving the interrogating party a reasonable opportunity to examine

and audit the records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or

summaries.

History

History: Added February 2, 2017, effective March 1, 2017.

Provenance

Source
wyocourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
61888801df93b9c6caaa93f908fb541e504e55db8ed2584fe9c5783d53e5a764
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.