Bindinglaw

WY · rules

Unif. R. Ch. Ct. 601

Deposition abuses

activein force · 2021-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Directions not to answer. —

(1) Where a direction to a witness not to answer a deposition question is

given pursuant to Rule 30(c)(2), W.R.C.P.Ch.C., and honored by the witness,

any party may seek an immediate ruling as to the validity of such direction.

(2) If a prompt ruling cannot be obtained, the direction not to answer may

stand and the deposition should continue until:

(A) A ruling is obtained; or

(B) The problem resolves itself;

but a direction not to answer on any ground not specified in Rule 30(c)(2),

W.R.C.P.Ch.C., shall not stand and the witness shall answer.

(b) Suggestive objections. — If the objection to a deposition question is on the

ground of privilege, the privilege shall be expressly stated and established as

required by Rule 26(b)(5), W.R.C.P.Ch.C. If the objection is on another ground,

the proper objection is ‘‘Objection’’ stating briefly the specific ground of

objection. Objections in the presence of the witness which are used to suggest

an answer to the witness are improper.

(c) Conferences between deponent and attorney. — An attorney for a deponent shall not initiate a private conference with the deponent during the actual

taking of deposition, except for the purpose of determining whether a privilege

should be asserted.

(d) Claim of privilege. — Where a claim of privilege is asserted during a

deposition and information is not provided on the basis of such assertion, the

attorney asserting the privilege shall identify during the deposition the

privilege being claimed. In addition to work product, the privileges set forth at

Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-12-101, the privilege for psychologists at Wyo. Stat. Ann. §

33-27-123, and any other privilege recognized by law, including a claim that

the information sought is proprietary and thereby should be protected, may be

asserted and identified as the privilege being claimed.

(e) This rule, and Rules 26(b)(5), 30(c)(2), and 30(d)(2), W.R.C.P.Ch.C., are

equally applicable to all attorneys participating in depositions, whether such

attorneys are appearing on behalf of a party or a non-party deponent.

History

History: Adopted September 21, 2021, effective December 1, 2021.

Provenance

Source
wyocourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
d319697ec81648a317e49f24a60b50efe8a3e5be57fde1c2fe4b6fa55f68637f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Unif. R. Ch. Ct. 601 — Deposition abuses · binding.law