WY · rules
Wyo. R. Prof. Conduct 8.2
Judicial and Legal Officials
(a) A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false
or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications
or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a
candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.
(b) A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall comply with the
applicable provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
History
History: Amended April 11, 2006, effective July 1, 2006; amended February 6, 2024, effective April 15, 2024. Comment.— [1] Assessments by lawyers are relied on in evaluating the professional or personal fitness of persons being considered for election or appointment to judicial office and to public legal offices, such as attorney general, prosecuting attorney and public defender. Expressing honest and candid opinions on such matters contributes to improving the administration of justice. Conversely, false statements by a lawyer can unfairly undermine public confidence in the administration of justice. [2] When a lawyer seeks judicial office, the lawyer should be bound by applicable limitations on political activity. [3] To maintain the fair and independent administration of justice, lawyers are encouraged to continue traditional efforts to defend judges and courts unjustly criticized. Definitional Cross-References “Knows” See Rule 1.0(g)
Provenance
- Source
- wyocourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
067a86672960ed44c4f646f3fc3b66e8fccb9a8cc71d06d79149462ef8cf9bca
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.