WV · rules
W. Va. Code of Jud. Conduct R. 4.2
Political and Campaign Activities of Judicial Candidates in Public Elections
(A) A judge or candidate* subject to public election* shall:
(1) act at all times in a manner consistent with the independence,* integrity,* and impartiality* of the judiciary;
(2) comply with all applicable election, election campaign, and election campaign fund-raising laws and regulations of this jurisdiction;
(3) review and approve the content of all campaign statements and materials produced by the candidate or his or her campaign committee, as authorized by Rule 4.4, before their dissemination;
(4) take reasonable measures to ensure that other persons do not undertake on behalf of the candidate activities, other than those described in Rule 4.4, that the candidate is prohibited from doing by Rule 4.1; and
(5) take corrective action if he or she learns of any misrepresentations made in his or her campaign statements or materials.
(B) A judge or candidate subject to public election may, except as prohibited by law:
(1) establish a campaign committee pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4.4;
(2) speak on behalf of his or her candidacy through any medium, including but not limited to advertisements, websites, or other campaign literature;
(3) attend or purchase tickets for dinners or other events sponsored by a political organization* or a candidate for public office;
(4) seek, accept, or use endorsements from any person or organization;
(5) communicate—in person or in advertising—membership in, affiliation with, or endorsement by a political party; and
(6) contribute to a political organization.
History
COMMENT [1] Paragraph (B) permits judicial candidates in public elections to engage in some political and campaign activities otherwise prohibited by Rule 4.1. [2] Despite paragraph (B), judicial candidates for public election remain subject to many of the provisions of Rule 4.1. For example, a candidate continues to be prohibited from soliciting funds for a political organization, knowingly making false or misleading statements during a campaign, or making certain promises, pledges, or commitments related to future adjudicative duties. See Rule 4.1(A), paragraphs (4), (9), and (11). [3] A judge or candidate may be a member of a political party, and that affiliation is and has been a matter of public record in West Virginia. A judge or candidate may be endorsed by or otherwise publicly identified or associated with a political party by a person or entity not affiliated with the judicial campaign. Therefore, a judge or candidate may maintain his or her party affiliation through a judicial election, and he or she may include political party affiliation or similar designation in campaign communications and literature. [4] Except as otherwise prohibited by law or these rules, paragraph (B) does not prohibit the use of the name or likeness of a judge or candidate by a third-party or impose a duty on the judge or candidate to have his or her name or likeness removed from a third-party’s materials. For example, unless otherwise prohibited, paragraph (B) does not prohibit a judge’s or candidate’s name or likeness from being used in the program for a sponsored event or recognition of a judge’s or candidate’s attendance by a third-party at a sponsored event. [5] Except as otherwise prohibited by law or these rules, endorsements used by a judge or candidate under paragraph (B)(4) may include the name or likeness of a third party. For example, unless otherwise prohibited, a judge or candidate may appear in a photograph with a third party and use that photograph in campaign communications and literature. Clerk's Notes on Rule 4.2 Rule 4.2 and its Comments are based on the Model Code with modification. The tiered approach in Paragraph (A) of the Model Code was simplified in light of the fact that all West Virginia judicial elections are nonpartisan as a result of the passage of House Bill 2010. Paragraphs (A)(1) through (4) are based on the Model Code. Paragraph (A)(5) is not contained in the Model Code and provides useful guidance about the need to take corrective action upon discovering misrepresentation in a judicial candidate’s campaign statements or materials. The opening clause of Paragraph (B) omits the time window set forth in Model Code. The time window in the Model Code is unnecessary because all judicial elections are not to be conducted in single- seat divisions, and state elections law already sets windows for pre-candidacy activities and formal declarations of candidacy. Paragraphs (B)(1) and (2) are based on the Model Code. However, Paragraph (B)(3) of the Model Code, which allows a judicial candidate to endorse another candidate running for the same office, is not included. This exception to the general prohibition in Rule 4.1(A)(3) has never been adopted in West Virgina. Paragraph (B)(3) is based on Paragraph (B)(4) of the Model Code. Paragraph (B)(4) is a modified version of Paragraph (B)(5) of the Model Code and does not include the Model Code’s limitation on seeking support from partisan political organizations. Paragraph (B)(5) is intended to provide guidance to candidates regarding the fact that membership in a political party may be articulated in the context of a nonpartisan election. Paragraph (B)(6) is a modified version of the Model Code. Comments [1] and [2] are modified versions of the Model Code, adjusted to take into account the changes described in this note. Comments [3] through [7] of the Model Code are omitted as unnecessary because they address distinctions between partisan and nonpartisan elections. Comments [3], [4], and [5] are not in the Model Code and are specific to West Virginia. Comments [4] and [5] provide guidance on the scope of Paragraph B.
Provenance
- Source
- courtswv.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
0ddcac12f6129908b276d1f1348b0922fd25f9359238826f0cebc0411397b73e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.