Bindinglaw

WV · rules

W. Va. Code of Jud. Conduct R. 3.3

Testifying as a Character Witness

activein force · 2026-09-24 – presentact-effective-date

A judge shall not testify as a character witness in a judicial, administrative, or other adjudicatory proceeding or otherwise vouch for the character of a person in a legal proceeding, except when subpoenaed to testify.

History

COMMENT [1] A judge who, without being subpoenaed, testifies as a character witness abuses the prestige of judicial office to advance the interests of another. See Rule 1.3. Except in unusual circumstances where the demands of justice require, a judge should discourage a party from requiring the judge to testify as a character witness. [2] Whether or not the demands of justice indicate the judge should testify depends on the nature and depth of the judge's actual awareness of the character of the party for whom the judge would testify. It also depends upon the actual necessity that it be the judge, as opposed to another possible witness who is called to testify. Only if the judge is in a unique position to offer meaningful testimony about the individual should the judge testify. Clerk's Notes on Rule 3.3 Rule 3.3 is based on the Model Code with the exception of the final phrase. The phrase “subpoenaed to testify” is used instead of the Model Code language “duly summoned.” Comment [1] is based on the Model Code. Comment [2] is not contained in the Model Code, but it was added in order to provide specific guidance in accord with applicable case law.

Provenance

Source
courtswv.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
4b2c30d7dfd74351718b30ce2527e715a631c581dd826ee4f4f295ac15c4068d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.