WI · rules
SCR 70.36
Judges' and circuit court commissioners’ certification of status of pending cases
(1)(a) Every judge of a
circuit court shall decide each matter submitted for decision within 90
days of the date on which the matter is submitted to the judge in final
form, exclusive of the time the judge has been actually disabled by
sickness. If a judge is unable to do so, within 5 days of the expiration of
the 90-day period the judge shall so certify in the record of the matter and
notify in writing the parties and the chief judge of the judicial
administrative district in which the matter is pending, and the period is
thereupon extended for one additional period of 90 days. This subsection
applies to an assigned reserve judge.
(b) In the exercise of its superintending and administrative
authority over all courts and upon written request from a chief judge, the
supreme court may extend the period specified in par. (a) for decision in
specific matters as exigent circumstances may require.
(2)(a) Within the first 10 days of each month every judge of a
circuit court shall execute and file with the office of the director of state
courts:
1. A certificate stating that there are no matters awaiting decision
beyond the 90-day or, if extended by certification and notification, the
180-day period specified in sub. (1)(a), but if the 90-day period has been
extended by certification and notification, a copy of the certification and
notification shall be attached to the certificate; or
2. If there are matters so pending, a certificate setting forth the
name and docket number of each of matter, the court in which it is
pending, and the date on which it was submitted to the judge in final form.
3. Certificates filed under subd. 1. or 2. shall be retained by the
office of the director of state courts for 10 years from the date of filing.
(b) The office of the director of state courts shall send a copy of
certificates listing pending matters to the chief judge of the judicial
administrative district in which those matters are pending and shall notify
the chief judge of a judicial administrative district of the failure of a judge
within the district to file an certificate pursuant to this subsection.
(3) The director of state courts, pursuant to SCR 70.10, and the
chief judge, pursuant to SCR 70.19(3)(a), shall assign judges as needed
or take other steps for the timely disposition of judicial business to assist
a judge who has filed a certificate under sub. (2)(a)2 or 3.
(4) Failure of a judge to comply with the requirements of sub.
(1)(a) or sub. (2)(a) may result in one or more of the following remedial
measures:
(a) Change of the judge's assignment, pursuant to SCR
70.19(3)(a).
(b) Referral of the matter by the director of state courts to the
supreme court for the initiation of contempt proceedings.
(c) Referral of the matter by the director of state courts to the
judicial commission for investigation of possible misconduct.
(5) (a) In this subsection,
1. “Chief judge” means the judge appointed under SCR 70.18
for the judicial administrative district in which the matter is pending.
2. “Circuit court commissioner” means a person appointed
under SCR 75.02 (1) and a person authorized under SCR 75.02 (3) to
the limited extent of that authorization.
(b) A circuit court commissioner should not routinely take
matters under advisement. Every circuit court commissioner shall
decide any matter within 30 days after the matter is submitted to him
or her for decision. If the circuit court commissioner is unable to
decide a matter within 30 days, he or she shall notify the chief judge
not later than 5 days before the end of the 30-day period. The chief
judge may extend the period to decide the matter for an additional 30
days or may require the circuit court commissioner to suspend all
other assigned activities until the decision is filed in the court.
(d) The chief judge may withdraw temporarily or permanently
the circuit court commissioner’s appointment or authority to act if the
commissioner fails to comply with par. (b).
History
COMMENT In addition to possibly constituting judicial misconduct under sec 757.81(4), Stats, a judge's failure to comply with this rule may constitute contempt of the supreme court and result in the court's imposing a fine for noncompliance. See, In re Hon. Charles E. Kading, 74 Wis.2d 405, 246 N.W.2d 903 (1976).
Provenance
- Source
- www.wicourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- 2026-09-23
- Content hash
f1391a8b3f3f293a2e7a9213542a167a8c983facfcfc6e2f49150098a95549dd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.