Bindinglaw

WI · rules

SCR 68.01

Purpose

activein force · 2022-12-07 – presentact-effective-date

(1) This chapter is promulgated by the supreme court to promote

communication among circuit courts, county officials, court planners, architects

and contractors concerning court facilities and security issues. It recognizes the

constitutionally appropriate participation of the supreme court and circuit courts in

addressing their facilities and staffing needs and priorities within the constraints

established by funding limitations and budget priorities. This chapter recognizes

the court's authority to direct activities and policies of the director of state courts

and of the judiciary. It is intended to assist counties and courts in making sound

decisions about the court facilities that serve the citizens of their Wisconsin

communities.

(2) This chapter establishes a flexible framework for courts' participation in

decision-making regarding court facilities while recognizing the wide range of

needs and circumstances which exist in counties across the state.

(3) The standards in this chapter apply to existing court facilities, to the

construction, remodeling and relocation of court facilities and to the review and

approval of court facilities under SCR 68.03 (2) and (4).

(4) All court facilities should be designed and maintained to support the

security and safety of judicial officers, participants in court proceedings, staff, and

members of the public.

Provenance

Source
www.wicourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
2026-09-23
Content hash
8cd1d0428b922b7495863090c90c632c8e50e7277e5b05da86f1020bbcc6aaeb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.