Bindinglaw

WI · rules

SCR 22.19

Petition for consensual license revocation

activein force · 2025-10-30 – presentact-effective-date

(1) An attorney who is the subject of an investigation for

possible misconduct or the respondent in a proceeding may file with the

supreme court a petition for the revocation by consent of his or her

license to practice law.

(2) The petition shall state that the petitioner cannot successfully

defend against the allegations of misconduct.

(3) If a complaint has not been filed or if a referee has not been

appointed in a pending disciplinary proceeding, the petition shall be

filed in the supreme court and shall include the director's summary of

the misconduct allegations being investigated. Within 20 days after the

date of filing of the petition, the director shall file in the supreme court

a recommendation on the petition. Upon a showing of good cause, the

supreme court may extend the time for filing a recommendation.

(4) If a complaint has been filed and a referee has been

appointed, the petition shall be filed in the supreme court and served on

the director and on the referee to whom the proceeding has been

assigned. Within 20 days after the filing of the petition, the director

shall file in the supreme court a response in support of or in opposition

to the petition and serve a copy on the referee. Upon a showing of good

cause, the supreme court may extend the time for filing a response. The

referee shall file a report and recommendation on the petition in the

supreme court within 30 days after receipt of the director's response.

(5) The supreme court shall grant the petition and revoke the

petitioner's license to practice law or deny the petition and remand the

matter to the director or to the referee for further proceedings.

Provenance

Source
www.wicourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
2026-09-23
Content hash
86513bc905649b407f1818638779e41d6c4e6ecf5097eb17bcbf88b83b38a863
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.