WI · rules
SCR 22.19
Petition for consensual license revocation
(1) An attorney who is the subject of an investigation for
possible misconduct or the respondent in a proceeding may file with the
supreme court a petition for the revocation by consent of his or her
license to practice law.
(2) The petition shall state that the petitioner cannot successfully
defend against the allegations of misconduct.
(3) If a complaint has not been filed or if a referee has not been
appointed in a pending disciplinary proceeding, the petition shall be
filed in the supreme court and shall include the director's summary of
the misconduct allegations being investigated. Within 20 days after the
date of filing of the petition, the director shall file in the supreme court
a recommendation on the petition. Upon a showing of good cause, the
supreme court may extend the time for filing a recommendation.
(4) If a complaint has been filed and a referee has been
appointed, the petition shall be filed in the supreme court and served on
the director and on the referee to whom the proceeding has been
assigned. Within 20 days after the filing of the petition, the director
shall file in the supreme court a response in support of or in opposition
to the petition and serve a copy on the referee. Upon a showing of good
cause, the supreme court may extend the time for filing a response. The
referee shall file a report and recommendation on the petition in the
supreme court within 30 days after receipt of the director's response.
(5) The supreme court shall grant the petition and revoke the
petitioner's license to practice law or deny the petition and remand the
matter to the director or to the referee for further proceedings.
Provenance
- Source
- www.wicourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- 2026-09-23
- Content hash
86513bc905649b407f1818638779e41d6c4e6ecf5097eb17bcbf88b83b38a863
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.