WI · rules
SCR 22.16
Proceedings before a referee
(1) The referee has the powers of a judge trying a civil action
and shall conduct the hearing as the trial of a civil action to the court.
The rules of civil procedure and evidence shall be followed. The
referee shall obtain the services of a court reporter to make a verbatim
record of the proceedings, as provided in SCR, Chapter 71.
(2) The hearing shall be held in the county of the respondent's
principal office or, in the case of a non-resident attorney, in the county
designated by the director. The referee, for cause, may designate a
different location.
(3) Unless otherwise provided by law or in this chapter, the
hearing before a referee and any paper filed in the proceeding is public.
(4)(a) If in the course of the proceeding the respondent claims to
have a medical incapacity that makes the defense of the proceeding
impossible, the referee shall conduct a hearing and make findings
concerning whether a medical incapacity makes defense of the
proceeding impossible. The referee may order the examination of the
respondent by qualified medical or psychological experts.
(b) All papers, files, transcripts, communications, and
proceedings on the issue of medical incapacity shall be confidential and
shall remain confidential until the supreme court has issued an order
suspending the attorney's license to practice law, or has otherwise
authorized disclosure.
(c) If the referee finds no medical incapacity that would make the
defense of the proceeding impossible, the referee shall proceed with the
misconduct action.
(d) If the referee finds that a medical incapacity makes the
defense of the proceeding impossible, the referee shall file a report
promptly with the supreme court. If the court disapproves the referee's
finding, the court shall direct the referee to proceed with the misconduct
action. If the court approves the referee's finding, the court shall abate
the misconduct proceeding and suspend the respondent's license to
practice law for medical incapacity until the court orders reinstatement
of the attorney's license under SCR 22.36. Upon reinstatement, the
court shall direct the referee to proceed with the misconduct action.
(5) The office of lawyer regulation has the burden of
demonstrating by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence that the
respondent has engaged in misconduct.
(6) Within 30 days after the conclusion of the hearing, the filing
of the hearing transcript, or the filing of a final post-hearing brief,
whichever is later, the referee shall file with the supreme court a report
setting forth findings of fact, conclusions of law regarding the
respondent's misconduct, if any, and a recommendation for dismissal
of the proceeding or the imposition of specific discipline, or a statement
advising the court why the referee cannot comply with this deadline and
the date by which the referee will file the report and recommendation.
(7) The referee shall file with the supreme court a
recommendation as to the assessment of reasonable costs within 10
days after the parties' submissions regarding assessment of costs.
History
COMMENT The court's general policy regarding assessment of costs in lawyer disciplinary matters is set forth in SCR 22.24. Procedures for filing the statement on costs and objecting to a statement on costs are set forth in SCR 22.24 (2). If the respondent does not object to the statement of costs then the referee's recommendation regarding costs shall be filed within 10 days of the deadline for filing an objection. If an objection is filed the recommendation shall be filed within 10 days after receiving the OLR's reply to the objection. COMMENT Wis. Stat. ch. 785 defines "contempt" and provides that a "court of record" may find a person in contempt and impose sanctions. A referee presiding over a lawyer disciplinary proceeding is not a "court of record." See also In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Strasburg, 217 Wis. 2d 318, 577 N.W.2d 1 (1998) (setting forth procedure to address contempt scenario in disciplinary proceeding).
Provenance
- Source
- www.wicourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- 2026-09-23
- Content hash
c9a2d7c1446c6ae0c9b71c673c1a03fe8d9dff9ec7bcaac6f44f98c035f5639a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.