Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 950

Privilege: Discipline by a Person Responsible for the Welfare of a Child

activein force · 2023-07-01 – presentas-observed

[AFTER THE ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME, BUT BEFORE THE

CONCLUDING PARAGRAPHS, ADD THE FOLLOWING.]

Defense of Reasonable Discipline

Discipline of a child is an issue in this case.

The State must prove by evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that

the defendant did not act reasonably in the discipline of a child.

The law allows a person responsible for the child’s welfare2 to use reasonable force to

discipline that child.3 Reasonable force is that force which a reasonable person would

believe is necessary.4

Whether a reasonable person would have believed that the amount of force used was

necessary and not excessive must be determined from the standpoint of the defendant at

the time of the defendant’s acts. The standard is what a person of ordinary intelligence and

prudence would have believed in the defendant’s position under the circumstances that

existed at the time of the alleged offense.5

In determining whether the discipline was or was not reasonable, you should consider

the age, physical and mental condition and disposition of the child, the conduct of the child,

the nature of the discipline, and all the surrounding circumstances.6 It is never reasonable

discipline to use force which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death or which

creates an unreasonable risk of great bodily harm or death.7

Jury’s Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all ____ elements of this offense8

have been proved and that the defendant did not act reasonably in the discipline of (name

child), you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 950 (7/2023). Release No. 62. Wisconsin Court System (7/2023). Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
822a5b8e4b4865a7d32e5e9bd1d14b07e58e33d8193754b20758e026d39bffa4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.