Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 605B

Verdict: Not Responsible by Reason of Mental Disease or Defect

activein force · 2011-05-01 – presentas-observed

Question 1: At the time the crime was committed, did the defendant have a mental

disease or defect?

Answer:

Yes or No

If you answer "yes" to question 1, answer question 2.

Question 2: As a result of the mental disease or defect, did the defendant lack

substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of the conduct or

to conform that conduct to the requirements of law?

Answer:

Yes or No

Dissenting Juror(s): as to Question(s)

as to Question(s)

History

Wis JI-Criminal 605B (2011). Release No. 49, 5/2011. © 2011, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
1dac0179b049951657d33c2697ec57408717b84f58b58eea43f9fa6d63696a5d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.