Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 6044

Possession of Methamphetamine Waste

activein force · 2009-07-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

The Wisconsin Statutes make it a crime to knowingly possess methamphetamine

manufacturing waste.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant knowingly possessed a substance.

"Possessed" means that the defendant knowingly 1 had actual physical control

of a substance. 2

ADD THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS THAT ARE

SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE.

[A substance is (also) in a person's possession if it is in an area over which

the person has control and the person intends to exercise control over the

substance.]

[It is not required that a person own a substance in order to possess it.

What is required is that the person exercise control over the substance.]

[Possession may be shared with another person. If a person exercises

control over a substance, the substance is in that person's possession, even

though another person may also have similar control.]

[It is not necessary that the quantity of the substance be substantial. Any

amount is sufficient.] 3

2. The substance was methamphetamine manufacturing waste.

3. The defendant knew that the substance was methamphetamine manufacturing

waste. 4

Meaning of "Methamphetamine Manufacturing Waste"

"Methamphetamine manufacturing waste" means any solid, semisolid, liquid or

contained gaseous material or article that results from or is produced by the manufacture

of methamphetamine. 5

Deciding About Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to determine knowledge. Knowledge must be

found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from

all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 6044 (2009). Release No. 47, 7/2009. © 2009, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
7bf47bc58549c494e58001c41e28964408b179eff826a4850700ce916bf1e0e8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.