WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 6037B
Keeping or Maintaining a Place Used for Manufacturing, Keeping, or Delivering Controlled Substances
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 961.42 of the Wisconsin Statutes provides that it is unlawful for any person
knowingly to keep or maintain any structure or place 2 which is used for manufacturing,
keeping, or delivering controlled substances. 3
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant kept or maintained a structure or place. 4
To keep or maintain a place is to exercise management or control over the
place.
This element does not require that the defendant owned (name of place),
but it does require that the defendant exercised management or control of the
place in question. 5
2. The place was used for (manufacturing) (keeping) (delivering) (name controlled
substance). 6 (Name controlled substance) is a controlled substance whose
(manufacture) (keeping) (delivery) is prohibited by law.
["Manufacturing" means the production, preparation, propagation, or
processing of a controlled substance.] 7
["Keeping" requires that controlled substances be kept for the purpose of
warehousing or storage for ultimate manufacture or delivery. It requires more
than simple possession.] 8
["Delivering" means the transfer or attempt to transfer something from one
person to another.] 9
3. The defendant kept or maintained the place knowingly.
"Knowingly" requires that the defendant knew that the place was used for the
(manufacture) (keeping) (delivery) of (name controlled substance). 10
Deciding About Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find knowledge. Knowledge must be found,
if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the
facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 6037B (2010). Release No. 48, 5/2010. © 2010, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
f63f1ca73d2932bf2ab6ae9d2b29a1101fcc5065beaa145a950900b644d55f65
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.