WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 6035
Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver with Lesser Included Offense of Possession of a Controlled Substance
Statutory Definition of the Crime
The Wisconsin Statutes make it a crime to possess a controlled substance with intent
to deliver.
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
were present.
Elements of Possession With Intent To Deliver That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant possessed a substance.
“Possessed” means that the defendant knowingly1 had actual physical control2
of a substance.
[It is not necessary that the quantity of the substance be substantial. Any
amount is sufficient.]3
2. The substance was (name controlled substance). (Name controlled substance) is a
controlled substance whose possession is prohibited by law.
3. The defendant knew or believed that the substance was [(name controlled
substance)] [a controlled substance. A controlled substance is a substance the
possession of which is prohibited by law.]4
IF THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT KNEW THE
SUBSTANCE BY A STREET NAME, INSERT THE FOLLOWING
PARAGRAPH:
[This element does not require that the defendant knew the precise chemical
or scientific name of the substance. If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt
that (street name) is a street name for (name controlled substance) and that the
defendant knew or believed the substance was (street name), you may find that the
defendant knew or believed the substance was a controlled substance.]
4. The defendant intended to deliver (name controlled substance).
“Deliver” means to transfer or attempt to transfer from one person to another.5
“Intended to deliver” means that the defendant had the purpose to deliver or
was aware that (his) (her) conduct was practically certain to cause delivery.6
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person’s mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant’s acts, words, and statements,
if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge. As a
part of the circumstances, you may consider the quantity and monetary value of the
substance.7
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of possession of
a controlled substance with intent to deliver have been proved, you should find the
defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must not find the defendant guilty of possession with
intent to deliver,8 [CONTINUE WITH THE FOLLOWING IF THE LESSER INCLUDED
OFFENSE IS SUBMITTED] and you should consider whether the defendant is guilty of
possession of (name controlled substance) in violation of section 961.41_____9 of the
Wisconsin Statutes.
Make Every Reasonable Effort to Agree
You should make every reasonable effort to agree unanimously on your verdict on the
charge of possession with intent to deliver before considering the offense of possession.
However, if after full and complete consideration of the evidence, you conclude that further
deliberation would not result in unanimous agreement on the charge of possession with
intent to deliver, you should consider whether the defendant is guilty of possession of
(name controlled substance).
Elements of Possession Of A Controlled Substance That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant possessed a substance.
2. The substance was (name controlled substance). (Name controlled substance) is a
controlled substance whose possession is prohibited by law.
3. The defendant knew or believed that the substance was [(name controlled
substance)] [a controlled substance. A controlled substance is a substance the
possession of which is prohibited by law.]10
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty of possession of a controlled
substance.
You are not, in any event, to find the defendant guilty of more than one of the foregoing
offenses. If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed a
controlled substance with intent to deliver, the offense charged in the information, you
should find the defendant guilty of that offense, and you must not find the defendant guilty
of the other lesser included offense I have submitted to you.
If you are not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that
the defendant committed either one of the offenses I have submitted to you, you must find
the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 6035 (1/2024). Release No. 63. Wisconsin Court System, 1/2024. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
7877e646af12685810b6a6d92d8280962ca036e076e9d44034afbed0c14a1aec
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.