Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 400 (example)

Example Party to Crime: Aiding and Abetting: Defendant Either Directly Committed or Intentionally Aided a Burglary

activein force · 2005-05-01 – presentas-observed

400 EXAMPLE PARTY TO CRIME: AIDING AND ABETTING:

DEFENDANT EITHER DIRECTLY COMMITTED OR

INTENTIONALLY AIDED A BURGLARY

Party to a Crime

Section 939.05 of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin provides that whoever is concerned in

the commission of a crime is a party to that crime and may be convicted of that crime

although that person did not directly commit it.

Two Ways in Which Defendant Can Be a Party to a Crime

The State contends that the defendant was concerned in the commission of the crime of

burglary by either directly committing it or by intentionally aiding and abetting the person

who directly committed it. If a person intentionally aids and abets the commission of a crime,

then that person is guilty of the crime as well as the person who directly committed it.

Definition of Aiding and Abetting

A person intentionally aids and abets the commission of a crime when, acting with

knowledge or belief that another person is committing or intends to commit a crime, (he)

(she) knowingly either:

• assists the person who commits the crime; or

• is ready and willing to assist and the person who commits the crime knows of the

willingness to assist.

To intentionally aid and abet a burglary, the defendant must know that another person is

committing or intends to commit the crime of burglary and have the purpose to assist the

commission of that crime.

[USE THE FOLLOWING IF SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE.]

[However, a person does not aid and abet if (he) (she) is only a bystander or spectator

and does nothing to assist the commission of a crime.]

400 EXAMPLE WIS JI-CRIMINAL 400 EXAMPLE

State's Burden of Proof – Party To A Crime

Before you may find the defendant guilty, the State must prove by evidence which

satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant directly committed the crime of

burglary or intentionally aided and abetted the commission of that crime.

Unanimous Agreement Not Required Regarding Theory Of Party To A Crime

All twelve jurors do not have to agree whether the defendant directly committed the

crime or aided and abetted the commission of the crime. However, each juror must be

convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was concerned in the commission of

the crime in one of those ways.

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Burglary, as defined in § 943.10 of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one

who intentionally enters the building of another without the consent of the person in lawful

possession and with intent to steal. 1

State's Burden of Proof

The State must prove by evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the

following four elements of burglary were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant or 2

intentionally entered a building.

2. The defendant or entered the building without the consent of the

person in lawful possession.

3. The defendant or knew that the entry was without consent.

4. The defendant or entered the building with intent to steal.

"Intent to steal" requires the mental purpose to take and carry away movable

property of another without consent and the intent to deprive the owner permanently

of possession of the property. It requires knowledge that the property belonged to

another person and that the person did not consent to the taking of the property.

400 EXAMPLE WIS JI-CRIMINAL 400 EXAMPLE

When Must Intent Exist?

The intent to steal must be formed before entry is made. The intent to steal, which is an

essential element of burglary, is no more or less than the mental purpose to steal formed at

any time before the entry, which continued to exist at the time of the entry.

Deciding About Intent and Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and

knowledge must be found, if found at all, from acts, words, and statements, if any, and from

all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent and knowledge.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant directly committed all

four elements of burglary or that the defendant intentionally aided and abetted the

commission of that crime, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 400 (2005). Release No. 43, 5/2005. © 2005, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
eef65dba72e8b9858603c6c66aff779060aba9dceb6963ea1b010a8b8718c0b5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.