WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 400
Party to Crime: Aiding and Abetting: Defendant Either Directly Committed or Intentionally Aided the Crime Charged
Section 939.05 of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin provides that whoever is concerned in
the commission of a crime is a party to that crime and may be convicted of that crime
although that person did not directly commit it.
Two Ways in Which Defendant Can Be a Party to a Crime
The State contends 1 that the defendant was concerned in the commission of the crime of
(name crime charged) by either directly committing it or by intentionally aiding and abetting
the person who directly committed it. If a person intentionally aids and abets the commission
of a crime, then that person is guilty of the crime as well as the person who directly
committed it.
Definition of Aiding and Abetting
A person intentionally aids and abets the commission of a crime when, acting with
knowledge or belief that another person is committing or intends to commit a crime, (he)
(she) knowingly either:
• assists the person who commits the crime; or
• is ready and willing to assist and the person who commits the crime knows of the
willingness to assist.
To intentionally aid and abet (name crime charge), the defendant must know that
another person is committing or intends to commit the crime of (name crime charged) and
have the purpose to assist the commission of that crime. 2
[USE THE FOLLOWING IF SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE.]
[However, a person does not aid and abet if (he) (she) is only a bystander or spectator
and does nothing to assist the commission of a crime.]
State's Burden of Proof B Party To A Crime
Before you may find the defendant guilty, the State must prove by evidence which
satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant directly committed the crime of
(name crime charged) or intentionally aided and abetted the commission of that crime.
Unanimous Agreement Not Required Regarding Theory Of Party To A Crime
All twelve jurors do not have to agree whether the defendant directly committed the
crime or aided and abetted the commission of the crime. However, each juror must be
convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was concerned in the commission of
the crime in one of those ways. 3
Statutory Definition of the Crime
(Name crime charged), as defined in § _________ of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin,
is committed by one who (state the elements of the crime). 4
State's Burden of Proof
The State must prove by evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the
following ______ 5 elements of (name crime charged) were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
DEFINE THE ELEMENTS OF THE CHARGED CRIME. USE THE
APPROPRIATE UNIFORM INSTRUCTIONS, OMITTING THE LAST TWO
PARAGRAPHS. USE "THE DEFENDANT OR (NAME OF OTHER PERSON) "
IN PLACE OF "THE DEFENDANT" THAT IS TYPICALLY USED IN THE
UNIFORM INSTRUCTION. IF THE NAME IS NOT KNOWN, USE "THE
DEFENDANT OR ANOTHER PERSON. " 6
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant directly committed all
______ 7 elements of (name crime charged) or that the defendant intentionally aided and
abetted the commission of that crime, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 400 (2005). Release No. 43, 5/2005. © 2005, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
0ce38a7fd42ac167426fe3ed937b8c32537508d81bc592b8be55fe7b85f91b23
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.