WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 2904
Securities Fraud: Making an Untrue Statement of Material Fact in Connection with the Sale of a Security
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 551.501(2) of the Wisconsin Statutes is violated by a person who willfully
makes an untrue statement of material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made not misleading, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase
of any security in this state.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The item [offered] [sold] was a security as defined by Wisconsin law.
A [insert applicable term from § 551.102(28)] is a security. 1
2. The defendant [made an untrue statement of material fact] [omitted to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made not misleading] in
connection with the offer, sale or purchase of a security in this state. 2
["Offered" includes every attempt or offer to sell or dispose of a security or
interest in a security for value.] 3
["Sold" includes every sale, disposition or exchange, and every contract of
sale of, or contract to sell, a security or interest in a security for value.] 4
A fact is a "material fact" if it could be expected to influence a reasonable
investor in making a decision whether to purchase an investment. 5
[A fact is also a "material fact" if the maker of the representation knows that
the investor regards the matter as important in making a decision whether to
purchase an investment, even though a reasonable investor would not regard it as
important.] 6
3. The defendant acted willfully.
"Wilfully" requires that the defendant knowingly [made an untrue
statement of material fact] [omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made not misleading] in connection with the offer, sale or
purchase of a security. Proof of intent to violate the law or knowledge that
the law was being violated is not required. 7
Deciding About Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find knowledge. Knowledge must be found,
if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the
facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
ADD THE FOLLOWING 8 IF THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN CHARGED
UNDER § 551.508(1m): THE VICTIM WAS AT LEAST 65 YEARS OF AGE
WHEN THE CRIME WAS COMMITTED:
If you find the defendant guilty, you must consider the following question:
Was (name of victim) at least 65 years of age when the crime was
committed?
Before you may answer the question "yes," the State must satisfy you beyond a
reasonable doubt that (name of victim) was at least 65 years of age when the crime was
committed.
If you are not so satisfied, you must answer this question "no."
History
Wis JI-Criminal 2904 (2014). Release No. 52, 4/2014. © 2014, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
aadd8d23defc21adb05033b76e534190963cb5819157cf5a60c7288d77809c8d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.