WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 2660C
Operating a Motor Vehicle with a Prohibited Alcohol Concentration - Criminal Offense - More than 0.02 Grams
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 346.63(1)(b) of the Wisconsin Statutes is violated by one who drives or
operates a motor vehicle on a highway 1 while that person has a prohibited alcohol
concentration. 2
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following [two] [three] 3
elements were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant (drove) (operated) a motor vehicle 4 on a highway. 5
Definition of "Drive" or "Operate"
["Drive" means the exercise of physical control over the speed and direction
of a motor vehicle while it is in motion.] 6
["Operate" means the physical manipulation or activation of any of the
controls of a motor vehicle necessary to put it in motion.] 7
2. The defendant had a prohibited alcohol concentration at the time the defendant
(drove) (operated) a motor vehicle.
Definition of "Prohibited Alcohol Concentration"
"Prohibited alcohol concentration" means 8
[more than .02 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath].
[more than .02 grams of alcohol in 100 milliliters of the person's blood].
NOTE: THE DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION OF THREE OR MORE PRIOR
CONVICTIONS DISPENSES WITH THE NEED FOR PROOF OF THE
FOLLOWING ELEMENT. IF THERE IS AN ADMISSION, DO NOT
INSTRUCT ON THIS ELEMENT AND PROCEED TO THE PARAGRAPH
CAPTIONED "HOW TO USE THE TEST RESULT EVIDENCE." 9
[3. The defendant had three or more convictions, suspensions, or revocations, as
counted under § 343.307(1).] 10
IF THE THIRD ELEMENT IS INCLUDED AND IF REQUESTED BY
THE DEFENDANT, THE FOLLOWING CAUTIONARY
INSTRUCTION SHOULD BE GIVEN: 11
[Evidence has been received that the defendant had prior convictions,
suspensions, or revocations. This evidence was received as relevant to the status
of the defendant's driving record, which is an issue in this case. It must not be
used for any other purpose and, particularly, you should bear in mind that
conviction, suspension, or revocation at some previous time is not proof that the
defendant drove or operated a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol
concentration on this occasion.]
How to Use the Test Result Evidence
The law states that the alcohol concentration in a defendant's (breath) (blood) (urine)
sample taken within three hours of (driving) (operating) a motor vehicle is evidence of
the defendant's alcohol concentration at the time of the (driving) (operating). 12
IF AN APPROVED TESTING DEVICE IS INVOLVED, THE FOLLOWING
MAY BE ADDED: 13
[The law recognizes that the testing device used in this case uses a scientifically
sound method of measuring the alcohol concentration of an individual. The State is not
required to prove the underlying scientific reliability of the method used by the testing
device. However, the State is required to establish that the testing device was in proper
working order and that it was correctly operated by a qualified person.]
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all the elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 2660C (2007). Release No. 45, 5/2007. © 2007, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
47dfe5800c4cedffcf0a760d9039bcc1d25b90dd522dd89899b87b45a2f550df
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.