Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 2620

Operating While Revoked: Criminal Offense: Based on Prior Conviction

activein force · 2010-05-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Section 343.44 of the Wisconsin Statutes is violated by one who knowingly operates

a motor vehicle upon any highway in this state while that person's operating privilege is

duly revoked.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant operated a motor vehicle 2 on a highway. 3

A motor vehicle is operated when it is set in motion. 4

2. The defendant's operating privilege 5 was duly revoked at the time the defendant

operated a motor vehicle.

[A person's operating privilege remains revoked until it is reinstated.] 6

3. The defendant knew (his) (her) operating privilege had been revoked. 7

Deciding About Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to find knowledge. Knowledge must be found,

if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the

facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.

IF THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT A NOTICE OF REVOCATION WAS

PROPERLY MAILED, ADD THE FOLLOWING: 8

[(Refusal to accept) (Failure to receive) an order of revocation is not, by itself, a

defense, but it is relevant to whether the defendant knew (his) (her) operating privileges

had been revoked. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant

knew (his) (her) operating privileges had been revoked regardless of whether the

defendant received written notice of revocation.]

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 2620 (2010). Release No. 48, 5/2010. © 2010, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
f447937c416821d247fa7a31aaa2033c3a2f0a5e174e4f2c62a0d6d510ee027c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.