Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 2590

Making a False Statement in an Application for a Certificate of Title - 342.06

activein force · 2025-02-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition

Section 342.06(2) of the Wisconsin Statues is violated by one who knowingly makes

a false statement in an application for certificate of title.

State’s Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements

were present.

Elements That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant made a false statement in an application for a certificate of title.1

2. The defendant made the false statement knowingly. This requires that the defendant

knew the statement was false.

Jury’s Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly made a

false statement in an application for a certificate of title, you should find the defendant

guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 2590 (2/2025). Release No. 67. Wisconsin Court System, 2/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
ab59ebe13b2ad0a585ce61beb11c81ebc7a1d02483d3c87edb5e08b202ac6f6d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Criminal 2590 — Making a False Statement in an… · binding.law