WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 2502
Commitment as a Sexually Violent Person Under Chapter 980, Wis. Stats
BEGIN WITH THE OPENING INSTRUCTIONS THAT WOULD BE USED IN
A CRIMINAL CASE. MOST CAN BE USED WITHOUT CHANGE.
INCLUDED IMMEDIATELY BELOW IS WIS JI-CRIMINAL 145 AND
INCLUDED AT THE END IS WIS JI CRIMINAL 140, BOTH OF WHICH ARE
MODIFIED FOR USE HERE.
A petition has been filed alleging that (name) is a sexually violent person. A sexually
violent person is one who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense and is dangerous
to others because he or she currently has a mental disorder that makes it more likely than
not1 that the person will engage in future acts of sexual violence.
You will now be asked to decide whether or not (name) is a sexually violent person.
The Petition
A petition is nothing more than a written, formal allegation that a person is a sexually
violent person. You are not to consider it as evidence against (name) in any way.
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find that (name) is a sexually violent person, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
are established.2
The Elements That Must be Proved
1. That (name) has been convicted of3 a sexually violent offense.
ELECT ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DEPENDING ON WHAT IS
ALLEGED IN THE PETITION.
[(Name crime specified in § 980.01(6)(a)) is a sexually violent offense.]4
[(Name crime specified in § 980.01(6)(b)) may be a sexually violent offense
if it is sexually motivated.5 “Sexually motivated” means that one of the purposes
for the offense was the actor’s sexual arousal or gratification or the sexual
humiliation or degradation of the victim.6]
2. That (name) currently has a mental disorder.
“Mental disorder” as used here, means a condition affecting the emotional or
volitional capacity that predisposes a person to engage in acts of sexual violence7
and causes serious difficulty in controlling behavior.8
The term “mental disorder” is also used in a more general way by the mental
health profession to diagnose and describe mental health-related symptoms and
disabilities. Only those mental disorders that predispose a person to engage in acts
of sexual violence and cause serious difficulty in controlling behavior are
sufficient for purposes of commitment as a sexually violent person.9
You are not bound by medical opinions given by witnesses, or by labels or
definitions used by witnesses, relating to what is or is not a mental disorder.10
3. That (name) is dangerous11 to others because (he) (she) has a mental disorder
which makes it more likely than not12 that (he) (she) will engage in one or more13
future acts of sexual violence.
Meaning of “Acts of Sexual Violence”
“Acts of sexual violence” means acts which would constitute “sexually
violent offenses.”14
ELECT ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DEPENDING ON WHAT
IS ALLEGED IN THE PETITION.15
[(Name crime or crimes specified in § 980.01(6)(a)) is a sexually violent
offense.]16
[(Name crime or crimes specified in § 980.01(6)(b)) may be a sexually
violent offense if it is sexually motivated.17 “Sexually motivated” means that
one of the purposes for the offense was the actor's sexual arousal or gratification
or the sexual humiliation or degradation of the victim.18]
ADD THE FOLLOWING IF EVIDENCE OF OTHER SEXUALLY VIOLENT
OFFENSES HAS BEEN ADMITTED.
Evidence of Other Offenses
[Evidence has been submitted that (name) committed other sexually violent offenses
before committing (identify offense on which the petition is based). This evidence alone
is not sufficient to establish that (name) has a mental disorder. Before you may find that
(name) has a mental disorder, you must be so satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt from all
the evidence in the case.19]
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the state has proved all three
elements, you should find that (name) is a sexually violent person.
If you are not so satisfied, you must not find that (name) is a sexually violent person.
State’s Burden of Proof
In reaching your verdict, examine the evidence with care and caution. Act with
judgment, reason, and prudence.
The law presumes that (name) is not a sexually violent person. Furthermore, (name)
does not have to prove anything. The burden is on the State to convince you beyond a
reasonable doubt that (name) is a sexually violent person.
If you can reconcile the evidence upon any reasonable hypothesis consistent with
(name) not being a sexually violent person, you should do so and find that (name) is not a
sexually violent person.
The term “reasonable doubt” means a doubt based upon reason and common sense. It
is a doubt for which a reason can be given, arising from a fair and rational consideration of
the evidence or lack of evidence. It means such a doubt as would cause a person of ordinary
prudence to pause or hesitate when called upon to act in the most important affairs of life.
A reasonable doubt is not a doubt which is based on mere guesswork, speculation,
sympathy, or fear. A reasonable doubt is not a doubt such as may be used to escape the
responsibility of a decision.
While it is your duty to give (name) the benefit of every reasonable doubt, you are not
to search for doubt. You are to search for the truth.20
History
Wis JI-Criminal 2502 (2021). Release No. 59. Wisconsin Court System, 2021. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
6f536509dc6c45b6e22e9280810b59d4e0f384779ef85e11614762ad6de59ac8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.