WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 2121A
Sexual Exploitation of a Child: Affirmative Defense
[USE THIS INSTRUCTION IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF THE DEFENSE
UNDER § 948.05(3).] 1
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Sexual exploitation of a child, as defined in § 948.05(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of
Wisconsin, is committed by one who records 2 or displays in any way a child engaged in
sexually explicit conduct with knowledge of the character and content of the sexually
explicit conduct involving the child. 3
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant (recorded) (displayed in any way) (name of child). 4
“Record” means to reproduce an image or a sound or to store data
representing an image or a sound. 5
[Consent by (name of child) is not a defense.] 6
2. (Name of child) had not attained the age of 18 years.
3. The defendant (recorded) (displayed in any way) (name of child) while (name of
child) was engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
“Sexually explicit conduct” means 7 actual or simulated (sexual intercourse)
(bestiality) (masturbation) (sexual sadism or sexual masochistic abuse) (lewd
exhibition of (name intimate parts)). 8
4. The defendant knew that the person in the (recording) (display) was engaged in
sexually explicit conduct. 9
Consider Whether the Defense is Proved
Wisconsin law provides that it is a defense to this crime if the defendant had
reasonable cause to believe that (name of child) had attained the age of 18 years.
The burden is on the defendant to prove by evidence which satisfies you to a
reasonable certainty by the greater weight of the credible evidence that this defense is
established. 10
“By the greater weight of the evidence” is meant evidence which, when weighed
against that opposed to it, has more convincing power. “Credible evidence” is evidence
which in the light of reason and common sense is worthy of belief.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied to a reasonable certainty by the greater weight of the credible
evidence that this defense is proved, you must find the defendant not guilty.
If you are not satisfied to a reasonable certainty by the greater weight of the credible
evidence that this defense is proved and you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that
all four elements of this offense have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all the elements of this offense
have been proved, you must find the defendant not guilty. 11
ADD THE FOLLOWING IF THE OFFENSE WAS CHARGED AS A CLASS
C FELONY AND THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS 18
YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE. 12
If you find the defendant guilty, you must answer the following question:
“Had the defendant attained the age of 18 years at the time of the offense?”
Before you may answer the question “yes,” you must be satisfied beyond a
reasonable doubt that the answer is “yes.”
If you are not so satisfied, you must answer the question “no.”
History
Wis JI-Criminal 2121A (2020). Release No. 58, 7/2020. © 2020, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
fba878318048c2ba7d3df98f4a0fa0e9e6dfec90ec02f6b34a31444e36b0be26
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.