WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 2108B
Physical Abuse of a Child: Failing to Act to Prevent Reckless Causing of Great Bodily Harm - 948.03(4)(a)
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Physical abuse of a child, as defined in § 948.03(4)(a) of the Criminal Code of
Wisconsin, is committed by a person responsible for the welfare of a child who has
knowledge that another person has recklessly caused great bodily harm to the child, is
physically and emotionally capable of taking action which will prevent the great bodily
harm from occurring, fails to take that action, and whose failure to act facilitates the great
bodily harm to the child that is recklessly caused by the other person.
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following seven elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. First, that the defendant was a person responsible for the welfare of a child,
(name of victim).
A “person responsible for the welfare of a child” includes (use the
appropriate term from § 948.01(3)).1
2. (Name of victim) had not attained the age of 18 years at the time of the alleged
offense.
Knowledge of (name of victim)’s age by the defendant is not required2 and
mistake regarding (name of victim)’s age is not a defense.3
3. (Name of principal) recklessly caused great bodily harm to (name of victim).
This requires that the (name of principal)’s conduct created a situation of
unreasonable risk of harm to (name of victim) and demonstrated a conscious
disregard for the safety of (name of victim).4
In determining whether the conduct created an unreasonable risk of harm and
showed a conscious disregard for the safety of (name of victim), you should
consider all the factors relating to the conduct. These include the following: what
the (name of principal) was doing; why (he) (she) was doing it; how dangerous
the conduct was; how obvious the danger was; and whether the conduct showed
any regard for the safety of (name of victim).5
“Great bodily harm” means injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or
which causes serious permanent disfigurement, or which causes a permanent or
protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ or
other serious bodily injury.6
4. The defendant knew or believed7 that (name of principal) recklessly caused great
bodily harm to (name of victim).
What the defendant knew or believed must be determined from the
standpoint of the defendant at the time of the alleged offense and not from the
viewpoint of the jury now.8
5. The defendant was physically and emotionally capable of taking action which
would have prevented the great bodily harm from occurring.9
6. The defendant failed to take that action.
7. The defendant’s alleged failure to act facilitated the great bodily harm to (name
of victim) that was recklessly caused by (name of principal) .10
Deciding About Knowledge and Belief
You cannot look into a person’s mind to find knowledge and belief. Knowledge and
belief must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if
any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all seven elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 2108B (2/2025). Release No. 67. Wisconsin Court System, 2/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e440b88f722372692ee484960d17b25c3310a506933f6ea8ed0fc51b674866f3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.