WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1988
Keeping an Animal with Intent That it Engage in Fighting
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 951.08(2) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is violated by one who owns,
possesses, keeps, or trains any animal with the intent that the animal be engaged in an
exhibition of fighting.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant (owned) (possessed) (kept) (trained) an animal. 1
2. The defendant did so with the intent that the animal be engaged in an exhibition
of fighting.
This requires that the defendant acted with the mental purpose 2 that the
animal be engaged in an exhibition of fighting.
Deciding About Intent
You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent. Intent must be found, if found at
all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the facts and
circumstances in this case bearing upon intent.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both elements of this offense have
been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1988 (2009). Release No. 47, 5/2009. © 2009, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
2704fb9798bb2fb5d2e09f8c052b4392f04b5c1057ad6ad28b84b9db6ceb2d93
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.