Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1980

Mistreating an Animal

activein force · 2013-04-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Mistreating an animal, as defined in §§ 951.02 and 951.18 of the Criminal Code of

Wisconsin, is committed by one who (intentionally) (negligently) 1 treats any animal in a

cruel manner.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant treated an animal 2 in a cruel manner.

"Cruel" means causing (unnecessary and excessive pain or suffering)

(unjustifiable injury or death). 3

2. The defendant (intentionally) (negligently) treated an animal in a cruel manner.

["Intentionally" requires that the defendant acted with the mental purpose to

treat the animal in a cruel manner or was aware that the conduct was practically

certain to cause that result.] 4

["Negligently" requires that the defendant's conduct amounted to "criminal

negligence." 5 "Criminal negligence" means:

• the conduct created a risk of death or great bodily harm; and

• the risk of death or great bodily harm was unreasonable and substantial;

and

• the defendant should have been aware that (his) (her) conduct created the

unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm.]

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both elements of this offense have

been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

ADD ONE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IF A FELONY OFFENSE IS

CHARGED 6

If you find the defendant intentionally treated an animal in a cruel manner, you must

answer the following question:

["Did treating the animal in a cruel manner result in the (mutilation) (disfigurement)

(death) of the animal?"] 7

["Did the defendant cause injury to the animal and know that the animal was used by

a law enforcement agency to perform agency functions or duties?"] 8

Before you may answer this question "yes," you must be satisfied beyond a

reasonable doubt that the answer to the question is "yes."

If you are not so satisfied, you must answer the question "no."

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1980 (2013). Release No. 51, 4/2013. © 2013, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
6d332324456dc13c38a7eaa2ec06177c6c7f5f25b0ba3c30a41bb55a458de287
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.