WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1980
Mistreating an Animal
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Mistreating an animal, as defined in §§ 951.02 and 951.18 of the Criminal Code of
Wisconsin, is committed by one who (intentionally) (negligently) 1 treats any animal in a
cruel manner.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant treated an animal 2 in a cruel manner.
"Cruel" means causing (unnecessary and excessive pain or suffering)
(unjustifiable injury or death). 3
2. The defendant (intentionally) (negligently) treated an animal in a cruel manner.
["Intentionally" requires that the defendant acted with the mental purpose to
treat the animal in a cruel manner or was aware that the conduct was practically
certain to cause that result.] 4
["Negligently" requires that the defendant's conduct amounted to "criminal
negligence." 5 "Criminal negligence" means:
• the conduct created a risk of death or great bodily harm; and
• the risk of death or great bodily harm was unreasonable and substantial;
and
• the defendant should have been aware that (his) (her) conduct created the
unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm.]
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both elements of this offense have
been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
ADD ONE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IF A FELONY OFFENSE IS
CHARGED 6
If you find the defendant intentionally treated an animal in a cruel manner, you must
answer the following question:
["Did treating the animal in a cruel manner result in the (mutilation) (disfigurement)
(death) of the animal?"] 7
["Did the defendant cause injury to the animal and know that the animal was used by
a law enforcement agency to perform agency functions or duties?"] 8
Before you may answer this question "yes," you must be satisfied beyond a
reasonable doubt that the answer to the question is "yes."
If you are not so satisfied, you must answer the question "no."
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1980 (2013). Release No. 51, 4/2013. © 2013, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
6d332324456dc13c38a7eaa2ec06177c6c7f5f25b0ba3c30a41bb55a458de287
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.