WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1919
Swatting
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Swatting, as defined in section 947.014 of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is
committed by one who intentionally conveys or causes to be conveyed any false
information that an emergency exists, which elicited, or could elicit a response from a
specialized tactical team, knowing such information to be false.
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant intentionally (conveyed) (caused to be conveyed) information
concerning the existence of an emergency.
“Emergency” means [Specify type of emergency as provided in
947.014(1)(b)].1
“Intentionally” means that the defendant must have had the mental purpose
to (convey) or (cause to be conveyed) information that an emergency exists. 2
2. The information was false.
3. The defendant knew that the information was false. This requires only that the
defendant believed that the information was false.3
4. The information (elicited) (could have elicited) a response from a specialized
tactical team.
A “specialized tactical team” means a special weapons and tactics team or
tactical response team that is designated by a law enforcement agency and whose
members are recruited, selected, trained, equipped, and assigned to resolve critical
incidents that involve a threat to public safety.4
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and
statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon
intent and knowledge.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
ADD ONE OF THE FOLLOWING IF THE OFFENSE WAS CHARGED AS A
CLASS H OR E FELONY AND THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THE
PENALTY-INCREASING FACT IS PRESENT5
[If you find the defendant guilty, you must answer the following question:
(Did the violation result in bodily harm to any person?)
(Did the violation result in great bodily harm to any person?)
Before you may answer the question “yes,” you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable
doubt that the answer is “yes.”
If you are not so satisfied, you must answer the question “no.”]
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1919 (2020). Release No. 58, 7/2020. © 2020, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c05e2d57500faa2239a8cb4e2cea5e29e6d9f73a39068a06a3f4964ad3d5aba3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.