Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1862

Food Stamp Fraud: Misstating Facts on an Application

activein force · 2015-04-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Food stamp fraud, as defined in § 946.92(2)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes, is

committed by a person who misstates or conceals facts in a food stamp program

application or report of income, assets, or household circumstances with the intent to

secure or continue to receive food stamp program benefits.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant (misstated) (concealed) facts in a food stamp program

[application] [report of income, assets, or household circumstances].

The facts claimed to have been (misstated) (concealed) in this case are:

(specify the alleged facts).

2. The defendant (misstated) (concealed) facts with the intent to [secure] [continue

to receive] food stamp program benefits.

"With intent to" 1 requires that the defendant had the mental purpose to obtain

food stamp program benefits by (misstating) (concealing) facts in the application.

Deciding About Intent

You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent. Intent must be found, if found at

all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the facts and

circumstances in this case bearing upon intent.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both elements of this offense have

been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

ADD THE FOLLOWING IF THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH

FRAUDULENTLY SECURING MORE THAN $100 AND THE EVIDENCE

WOULD SUPPORT THAT FINDING 2

If you find the defendant guilty, you must also determine beyond a reasonable doubt

the value of the food stamp program benefits for which the defendant was not eligible

and insert that amount in the verdict.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1862 (2015). Release No. 53, 4/2015. © 2015, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
a7d2ea8733b88976bc871f3e678959fa6a386ee422328e83b8df8775a201d4ea
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Criminal 1862 — Food Stamp Fraud: Misstating F… · binding.law