Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1848

Unemployment Insurance Fraud: Making a False Statement to Obtain a Benefit Payment

activein force · 2019-07-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Unemployment insurance fraud, as defined in § 108.24(1)(a) of the Wisconsin

Statutes, is committed by any person who knowingly makes a false statement or

representation to obtain any benefit payment under Chapter 108, either for himself or

herself or for any other person.

State’s Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant obtained a benefit under Chapter 108 for (himself) (herself)

(another person), by making a (statement) (representation).

2. The (statement) (representation) to obtain a benefit under Chapter 108 was false

when made.

3. The defendant knew the (statement) (representation) to obtain a benefit under

Chapter 108 was false when made.

Deciding About Knowledge

You cannot look into a person’s mind to find knowledge. Knowledge must be found,

if found at all, from the defendant’s acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the

facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.

Jury’s Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

ADD THE FOLLOWING IF THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH

FRAUDULENTLY SECURING MORE THAN $2,500 AND THE EVIDENCE

WOULD SUPPORT THAT FINDING. 1

If you find the defendant guilty, you must also determine beyond a reasonable doubt

the value of any unemployment insurance benefits for which the defendant was not

eligible and insert that amount in the verdict. 2

Determining Value

(“Was the value of any benefit obtained more than $10,000?”

Answer: “yes” or “no.”)

(“Was the value of any benefit obtained more than $5,000?”

Answer “yes” or “no.”)

(“Was the value of any benefit obtained more than $2,500?”

Answer “yes” or “no.”)

Before you answer “yes,” you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the

value of any benefit obtained was more than the amount stated in the question.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1848 (2019). Release No. 57, 7/2019. © 2019, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
5b7ca9faa417c3bde79118608a2f03f6f4a005d5c06b603a8fd690c898181b37
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.