WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1848
Unemployment Insurance Fraud: Making a False Statement to Obtain a Benefit Payment
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Unemployment insurance fraud, as defined in § 108.24(1)(a) of the Wisconsin
Statutes, is committed by any person who knowingly makes a false statement or
representation to obtain any benefit payment under Chapter 108, either for himself or
herself or for any other person.
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant obtained a benefit under Chapter 108 for (himself) (herself)
(another person), by making a (statement) (representation).
2. The (statement) (representation) to obtain a benefit under Chapter 108 was false
when made.
3. The defendant knew the (statement) (representation) to obtain a benefit under
Chapter 108 was false when made.
Deciding About Knowledge
You cannot look into a person’s mind to find knowledge. Knowledge must be found,
if found at all, from the defendant’s acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the
facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
ADD THE FOLLOWING IF THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH
FRAUDULENTLY SECURING MORE THAN $2,500 AND THE EVIDENCE
WOULD SUPPORT THAT FINDING. 1
If you find the defendant guilty, you must also determine beyond a reasonable doubt
the value of any unemployment insurance benefits for which the defendant was not
eligible and insert that amount in the verdict. 2
Determining Value
(“Was the value of any benefit obtained more than $10,000?”
Answer: “yes” or “no.”)
(“Was the value of any benefit obtained more than $5,000?”
Answer “yes” or “no.”)
(“Was the value of any benefit obtained more than $2,500?”
Answer “yes” or “no.”)
Before you answer “yes,” you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the
value of any benefit obtained was more than the amount stated in the question.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1848 (2019). Release No. 57, 7/2019. © 2019, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
5b7ca9faa417c3bde79118608a2f03f6f4a005d5c06b603a8fd690c898181b37
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.