Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1782

Assisting Escape by Public Officer or Employee

activein force · 2008-05-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Assisting escape, as defined in § 946.44(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is

committed by a public (officer) (employee) who, with intent to aid any prisoner to escape

from custody, introduces into the institution 1 where the prisoner is detained anything

adapted for or useful in making an escape.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant was a public (officer) (employee). 2

[A "public officer" is any person appointed or elected according to law to

discharge a public duty for the state or one of its subordinate governmental

units.]

[A "public employee" is any person, not an officer, who performs any

official function on behalf of the state or one of its subordinate governmental

units and who is paid from the public treasury of the state or subordinate

governmental unit.]

2. The defendant introduced into the institution, where (name of prisoner) was

detained, something adapted for or useful in making an escape.

3. The defendant acted with the intent to aid a prisoner 3 to escape from custody.

This requires that the defendant had the mental purpose to help (name of

prisoner) escape from custody. 4 "Escape" means to leave custody without

lawful permission or authority. 5

Deciding About Intent

You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent. Intent must be found, if found at

all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the facts and

circumstances in this case bearing upon intent.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1782 (2008). Release No. 46, 5/2008. © 2008, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
cb6ba33634823157d2a89caad7934d5983a30d810ea6ef1be7f25f7186ceea46
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.