Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1779

Assault by a Prisoner: Restraining or Confining an Officer, Employee, Visitor, or Inmate

activein force · 2001-04-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Assault by a prisoner, as defined in § 946.43(1) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin,

is committed by one who is a prisoner confined to a [state prison] [(state) (county)

(municipal) detention facility] who intentionally confines or restrains (an officer) (an

employee) (a visitor) (an inmate) of the institution without the consent of that person.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following five elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant was a prisoner confined to a [state prison] [(state) (county)

(municipal) detention facility].

This requires that the defendant was confined in a (prison) (detention

facility) as a result of a violation of law. 1

(Name of institution) is a [state prison] [(state) (county) (municipal)

detention facility]. 2

2. (Name of victim) was (an officer) (an employee) (a visitor) (an inmate) of

(name of institution).

3. The defendant intentionally confined or restrained (name of victim).

If the defendant deprived (name of victim) of freedom of movement or

compelled (him) (her) to remain where (he) (she) did not wish to remain, then

(name of victim) was confined or restrained. The use of physical force is not

required. One may be confined or restrained by acts or words or both. 3

"Intentionally confined or restrained" means that the defendant had the

purpose to confine or restrain (name of victim). 4

4. The defendant confined or restrained (name of victim) without consent. 5

5. The defendant knew (name of victim) was (an employee) (an officer) (a visitor)

(an inmate) of (name prison or institution) and knew that (name of victim) did

not consent to the confining or restraining. 6

Deciding About Intent and Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and

knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and

statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon

intent and knowledge.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all five elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1779 (2001). Release No. 39, 4/2001. © 2001, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
134aec994a8fee66f0c5d838d4069df649535e0249b087ee75809327da458160
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.