Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1771

Escape from Custody Resulting from Violation of Probation, Parole, or Extended Supervision

activein force · 2009-05-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Escape from custody, as defined in § 946.42(2m) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin,

is committed by a person who intentionally escapes from the custody of a probation,

parole, or extended supervision agent, or a correctional officer, when that custody

resulted from an allegation or finding of a violation of the rules or conditions of

probation, parole, or extended supervision.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant was in the custody of a (probation agent) (parole agent) (extended

supervision agent) (correctional officer).

"Custody" means the physical custody or authorized physical control of a

person by a (probation agent) (parole agent) (extended supervision agent)

(correctional officer). 1

2. The custody resulted from (an allegation) (a finding) that the defendant violated

the rules or conditions of (probation) (parole) (extended supervision). 2

3. The defendant escaped from custody.

"Escape" means to leave in any manner without lawful permission or

authority. 3

4. The escape from custody was intentional.

This requires that the defendant intentionally escaped from custody, that is,

that the defendant had the mental purpose to escape. 4

Deciding About Intent

You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent. Intent must be found, if found at

all, from the defendant's acts, words, ands statements, if any, and from all the facts and

circumstances in this case bearing upon intent.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1771 (2009). Release No. 47, 5/2009. © 2009, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
a47e024cc464c42c26fd2b308efd600977ddc5ff2c615631963f904a768453da
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Criminal 1771 — Escape from Custody Resulting… · binding.law