WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1768
Failure to Comply with an Officer's Attempt to Take a Person into Custody
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 946.415 of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is violated by a person who
intentionally does all of the following:
• refuses to comply with an officer's lawful attempt to take the person into custody;
• retreats or remains in a building or place and, through action or threat, attempts
to prevent the officer from taking the person into custody; and,
• remains or becomes armed with a dangerous weapon or threatens to use a
dangerous weapon, regardless of whether the person has a dangerous weapon.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant intentionally refused to comply with an officer's 1 lawful attempt to
take the defendant into custody.
"Intentionally" requires that the defendant knew that an officer was lawfully
attempting to take the defendant into custody. 2
2. The defendant intentionally retreated or remained in a building or place and,
through action or threat, intentionally attempted to prevent the officer from
taking the defendant into custody.
3. While committing elements 1. and 2., 3 the defendant intentionally [(remained)
(became) armed with a dangerous weapon] [threatened to use a dangerous
weapon regardless of whether the defendant had a dangerous weapon]. 4
IF DEFINITION OF "ARMED" IS NEEDED, ADD THE FOLLOWING:
["Armed" means that a dangerous weapon must have been either on the
defendant's person or within the defendant's reach.] 5
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent or knowledge. Intent and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and
statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon
intent and knowledge.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1768 (2008). Release No. 46, 5/2008. © 2008, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d0d177885cb2d2fbcc12d67eaf2fa698182b9f63de0474a40ec91b9e9d2b1ebf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.