Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1734

Misconduct in Public Office (by Unlawful Solicitation or Acceptance of Anything of Value)

activein force · 2008-05-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Misconduct in public office, as defined in § 946.12(5) of the Criminal Code of

Wisconsin, is committed by one who is a (public officer) (public employee) and who,

under color of (his) (her) (office) (employment) intentionally solicits or accepts for the

performance of any service or duty anything of value which (he) (she) knows is greater or

less than fixed by law.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. At the time of the alleged offense, the defendant was a (public officer) (public

employee). A (position) is a (public officer) (public employee). 1

2. The defendant intentionally solicited or accepted anything of value 2 for the

performance of any service or duty.

"Intentionally" means that the defendant had the mental purpose 3 to solicit or

accept anything of value for the performance of any service or duty.

[The (services) (duties) of a (position) include .] 4

3. The defendant knew that the amount (solicited) (accepted) was greater or less

than is fixed by law.

4. The defendant acted under color of (his) (her) (office) (employment). 5

"Under color of (office) (employment)" means to act under the apparent

authority of the (office) (employment). 6

Deciding About Purpose and Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to find purpose and knowledge. Purpose and

knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and

statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon

purpose and knowledge.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of this offense

have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1734 (2008). Release No. 46, 5/2008. © 2008, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
42cd2e68a8c0348a9d23877e43ebba5743a4665acebda337eafe89dea44cd5d4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Criminal 1734 — Misconduct in Public Office (b… · binding.law