WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 160
Closing Arguments of Counsel
Consider carefully the closing arguments of the attorneys, but their arguments and
conclusions and opinions are not evidence. Draw your own conclusions from the evidence,
and decide upon your verdict according to the evidence, under the instructions given you by
the court.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 160 (2000). Release No. 38, 4/2000. Wis JI-Criminal 160 (© 1962) was cited with approval in State v. Draize, 88 Wis.2d 445, 455-565, 276. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
dc246981a26c6241a51ee93f5581af6ae5045201b18267dd3e0abbceeadd0452
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.