WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1505
Computer Crime
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Computer crime, as defined by § 943.70(2)(a)6. of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin,
is committed by one who willfully, knowingly, and without authorization discloses
restricted access codes or other restricted access information to unauthorized persons.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant disclosed restricted access codes or other restricted access
information 1 to (name of person).
2. (Name of person) was not authorized to receive the restricted information.
3. The defendant had no authorization to disclose restricted access codes or other
restricted access information to (name of person).
4. The defendant acted intentionally. 2
This requires that the defendant acted with the purpose of disclosing
restricted access codes or other restricted access information to an unauthorized
person. It further requires that the defendant knew that (he) (she) did not have
authorization and knew that the disclosure was to an unauthorized person.
Deciding About Purpose and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find purpose and knowledge. Purpose and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and
statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon
purpose and knowledge.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
ADD ONE OF THE FOLLOWING IF A FACT INCREASING THE PENALTY
AS SET FORTH IN § 943.70(2)(b)2., 3g., 3r., or 4. IS ALLEGED AND THE
EVIDENCE WOULD SUPPORT A FINDING THAT IT IS PRESENT: 3
[If you find the defendant guilty, you must answer the following question:
["Was the offense committed (to defraud) (to obtain property 4)?"] 5
["Did the offense result in damage valued at more than $2,500?"] 6
["Did the offense cause an interruption or impairment of (governmental
operations) (public communication) (transportation) (a supply of water, gas, or
other public service)?"] 7
["Did the offense create a situation of unreasonable risk and high probability of
death or great bodily harm to another?"] 8
Before you may answer this question "yes," the State must prove by evidence which
satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the answer to the question is "yes."
If you are not so satisfied, you must answer the question "no."]
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1505 (2009). Release No. 47, 5/2009. © 2009, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
12a0f34386db51539491e674ffe8b9f2825d77af1e5ec61cc41b555600cee6af
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.