Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1492

Uttering a Forged Writing (Check)

activein force · 2009-07-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Uttering a forged writing, defined in § 943.38(2) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin,

is committed by one who utters as genuine a forged writing or object by which legal

rights or obligations are created or transferred, knowing that the writing or object was

falsely made or altered.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The document in this case was a writing 1 by which legal rights or obligations are

created or transferred.

(A bank check) (An endorsement on a bank check) is such a writing. 2

2. The (check) (endorsement) was forged, that is, falsely (made) (altered).

The check must have been falsely (made) (altered) to appear to have been

made (by another person) (at another time) (with different terms) (by authority of

someone who really did not give such authority). 3

3. The (check) (endorsement) was uttered as genuine by the defendant.

"To utter (a check) (an endorsement) as genuine" simply means that the

check is presented for payment (or cashed) with the representation that the

(check) (endorsement) is genuine. 4

4. The defendant knew the (check) (endorsement) was falsely (made) (altered) at

the time it was presented. 5

Deciding About Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to find knowledge. Knowledge must be found,

if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and from all the

facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of uttering a

forged writing have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1492 (2009). Release No. 47, 7/2009. © 2009, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
438f7f3f80339294c3065cdd272193e511a56c3e0c569a39b814bf357b063389
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.