Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1465

Driving or Operating a (Vehicle) (Commercial Motor Vehicle) Without the Owner's Consent

activein force · 2019-07-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Driving or operating a (vehicle) (commercial motor vehicle) without the owner’s consent,

as defined in § 943.23(3) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who

intentionally drives or operates a (vehicle) (commercial motor vehicle) without the consent of the

owner.

State’s Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements were

present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant intentionally (drove) (operated) a (vehicle) 1 (commercial motor

vehicle) 2 without the consent of the owner. 3

[“Drive” means to exercise physical control over the speed and direction of a

vehicle while it is in motion.] 4

[“Operate” means the physical manipulation or activation of any of the controls of

a vehicle necessary to put it into motion.] 5

[“Commercial motor vehicle” means a motor vehicle designed or used to

transport passengers or property and having one or more of the following

characteristics (identify a characteristic provided in s. 340.01(8)(a) – (d)).]

[A person (drives) (operates) without consent even though the owner consented to

the original taking if the person (drives) (operates) the vehicle in a manner that goes

beyond the scope of the use authorized or permitted by the owner.] 6

2. The defendant knew that the owner of the vehicle did not consent to (driving)

(operating) the (vehicle) (commercial motor vehicle). 7

Deciding About Intent and Knowledge

You cannot look into a person’s mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and

knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant’s acts, words, and statements, if

any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent and knowledge. 8

Jury’s Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both elements of this offense have

been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE UNDER SUB. (3m),

ADD THE MATERIAL FROM WIS JI-CRIMINAL 1465A. 9

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1465 (2019). Release No. 57, 7/2019. © 2019, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
45a9a994594cac57ec870dfd6c0421f4b4aad9a55981b9ce6619a144aa5b5ef8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.