WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1459
Unauthorized Use of an Entity's Identifying Information or Documents
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 943.203(2) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is violated by one who
intentionally uses, attempts to use, or possesses with intent to use any identifying
information or identification document of an entity [to obtain credit, money, goods,
services, or anything else of value or benefit] [to harm the reputation or property of the
entity] without the authorization or consent of the entity and by representing that [he or
she is the entity] [he or she is acting with the authorization or consent of the entity].
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
are present.
Elements of the Crime That The State Must Prove
1. The defendant intentionally [(used) (attempted to use) (possessed with intent to
use)] 1 [(identifying information) (an identification document)] 2 of an entity. (A
corporation) (A partnership) (An association) (A body politic) is an entity. 3
CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.
[(Insert term from § 943.203(1)(c) 1. through 8.) is “identifying
information.”] 4
[“Identification document” means:
(a document containing identifying information.)
(an entity’s card or plate that can be used to obtain money, goods, services,
or any other thing of value or benefit 5 or to initiate a transfer of funds.)
(any device that is unique to, assigned to, or belongs to an entity and is
intended to be used to access services, funds, or benefits of any kind to
which the entity is entitled.)] 6
2. The defendant intentionally [(used) (attempted to use) (possessed with intent to
use)] [(identifying information) (an identification document)] of the entity [to
obtain credit, money, goods, services, or anything else of value or benefit] [to
harm the reputation or property of the entity].
3. The defendant acted without the authorization or consent of the entity and knew
that the entity did not give authorization or consent. 7
4. The defendant intentionally represented 8 that [(he) (she) was the entity] [(he)
(she) was acting with the authorization or consent of the entity)]. 9
“Intentionally” requires that the defendant had the mental purpose 10 to obtain
credit, money, goods, services, or anything else of value or benefit by using
(identifying information) (an identification document) of the entity without the
entity’s consent or authorization.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1459 (2019). Release No. 57, 7/2019. © 2019, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
4226aac15806988fd16c6884f45a9326e8cdb5cf74dae55402ffaa05361d097c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.