WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1458
Unauthorized Use of an Individual's Personal Identifying Information or Documents
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 943.201(2) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is violated by one who
intentionally uses, attempts to use, or possesses with intent to use any personal
identifying information or personal identification document of an individual, including a
deceased individual, [to obtain credit, money, goods, services, employment or anything
else of value or benefit] [to avoid civil or criminal process or penalty] [to harm the
reputation, property, person, or estate of the individual] without the authorization or
consent of the individual and by representing that [he or she is the individual] [he or she
is acting with the authorization or consent of the individual] [that the information or
document belongs to him or her].
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
are present.
Elements of the Crime That The State Must Prove
1. The defendant intentionally [(used) (attempted to use) (possessed with intent to
use)] 1 [(personal identifying information) (a personal identification document)] 2
of (name of individual). 3
CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.
[(Insert term from § 943.201(1)(b) 1. through 15.) is “personal identifying
information.”] 4
[“Personal identification document” means:
(a document containing personal identifying information.)
(an individual’s card or plate that can be used to obtain money, goods,
services, or any other thing of value or benefit or to initiate a transfer of
funds.)
(any device that is unique to, assigned to, or belongs to an individual and is
intended to be used to access services, funds, or benefits of any kind to
which the individual is entitled.)] 5
2. The defendant intentionally [(used) (attempted to use) (possessed with intent to
use)] [(personal identifying information) (a personal identification document)] of
(name of individual) [to obtain credit, money, goods, services, employment or
anything else of value or benefit] [to avoid civil or criminal process or penalty]
[to harm the reputation, property, person, or estate of the individual]. 6
3. The defendant acted without the authorization or consent of (name of individual)
and knew that (name of individual) did not give authorization or consent. 7
4. The defendant intentionally represented 8 that [(he) (she) was (name of
individual)] [(he) (she) was acting with the authorization or consent of (name of
individual))] [the information or document belonged to him or her]. 9
“Intentionally” requires that the defendant had the mental purpose 10 to obtain
credit, money, goods, services, employment or anything else of value or benefit
by using (personal identifying information) (a personal identification document)
of (name of individual) without (name of individual)’s consent or authorization.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all four elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1458 (2019). Release No. 57, 7/2019. © 2019, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
cc3c1e7c922273be55e1a3582c02c0917469b4bf6018acac2e524d158c491b95
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.