Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1401A

Criminal Damage to Religious or Cemetery Property

activein force · 2003-04-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Criminal damage to property, as defined in [§ 943.012(1)] [§ 943.012(2)] of the Criminal

Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who intentionally causes damage 1 to [religious]

[cemetery] property2 of another person without the person's consent.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following five elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant caused damage to property of another. 3

The word "damage" includes anything from mere defacement to total

destruction. 4

2. The defendant intentionally caused the damage.

The term "intentionally" requires that the defendant had the mental purpose to

damage the property or was aware that the conduct was practically certain to cause

that result. 5

3. The defendant caused the damage without the consent 6 of (name of owner, agent,

etc.).

4. The property was [religious] [cemetery] property.

["Religious property" means any church, synagogue, or other building,

structure, or place primarily used for religious worship or another religious

purpose.] 7

["Cemetery property" means any cemetery, mortuary, other facility used for

burial or memorializing the dead.] 8

5. The defendant knew the property was [religious] [cemetery] property, knew the

property belonged to another person, and knew that the other person did not consent

to the damage. 9

Deciding About Intent and Knowledge

You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent or knowledge. Intent and knowledge

must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and

from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent and knowledge.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all five elements of this offense have

been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1401A (2003). Release No. 41, 4/2003. © 2003, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
4b756d05f271711e5a988836d12399714e0aad188584965a19fbae2f3ae42fd9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.