WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1360
Obstructing Emergency Medical Personnel
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Obstructing emergency medical personnel, as defined by § 941.37(3) of the Criminal
Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who intentionally interferes with any emergency
medical personnel in the performance of duties relating to an emergency or rescue and who
has reasonable grounds to believe that the interference may endanger another's safety.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant interfered with (identify appropriate category for the victim) 1 in the
performance of duties relating to an emergency or rescue.
(Identify appropriate category for the victim) are emergency medical
personnel. 2
"Interfere" means to delay, prevent, hinder, or impede.
2. The defendant intentionally interfered with (a) (an) (identify appropriate category
for the victim).
"Intentionally" means that the defendant acted with the purpose to interfere with
(a) (an) (identify appropriate category for the victim). 3 It also requires that the
defendant knew that the person was (a) (an) (identify appropriate category for the
victim) and knew that (he) (she) was performing duties relating to an emergency or
rescue. 4
3. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe that the interference might
endanger the safety of another person.
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if
any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent and knowledge.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense have
been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
ADD ONE OF THE FOLLOWING IF THE OFFENSE WAS CHARGED
AS A CLASS E FELONY AND THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THE
PENALTY-INCREASING FACT IS PRESENT. 5
If you find the defendant guilty, you must answer the following question:
Did the defendant's violation contribute to the death of another person?
Before you may answer the question "yes," you must be satisfied beyond a
reasonable doubt that the answer is "yes."
If you are not so satisfied, you must answer the question "no."
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1360 (2018). Release No. 56, 7/2018. © 2018, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
96b7481c55a4bbb63932e923810043d21dd2db951f36c363231ef664f7788463
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.