WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1322A
Endangering Safety by Use of a Dangerous Weapon: Intentionally Pointing a Firearm at a Law Enforcement Officer, Fire Fighter, Etc.
THIS INSTRUCTION IS DRAFTED FOR A CASE WHERE THE ALLEGED
VICTIM IS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. THE STATUTE ALSO
APPLIES TO OFFENSES AGAINST FIRE FIGHTERS, EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES PRACTITIONERS, 1 EMERGENCY MEDICAL
RESPONDERS,2 AMBULANCE DRIVERS,3 AND COMMISSION WARDENS.4
SUBSTITUTE THE APPROPRIATE TERM AS REQUIRED.
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, as defined in § 941.20(1m) of the
Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who intentionally points a firearm at or
toward a law enforcement officer who is acting in an official capacity and who the person
knows or has reason to know is a law enforcement officer.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following five elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant pointed a firearm at or toward (name of victim).
The term "firearm" means a weapon that acts by the force of gunpowder. 5 It is
not necessary that the firearm was loaded or capable of being fired. 6
2. The defendant pointed the firearm at or toward (name of victim) intentionally.
"Intentionally" means that the defendant was aware that (he) (she) was holding a
firearm and was aware that (he) (she) was pointing it at or toward another person. 7
3. (Name of victim) was a law enforcement officer.
[A (insert title, e.g., sheriff) is a law enforcement officer.] 8
4. (Name of victim) was acting in an official capacity.
(Insert title, e.g., sheriffs) act in an official capacity if they perform duties that
they are employed to perform. A (insert title, e.g., sheriff) who performs acts for
personal reasons that are not within the responsibilities of a (insert title, e.g.,
sheriff) does not act in an official capacity. 9 (The responsibilities of a (insert title,
e.g., sheriff) include: _________________.) 10
5. The defendant knew or had reason to know that (name of victim) was a law
enforcement officer. 11
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent or knowledge. Intent and knowledge
must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements, if any, and
from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent or knowledge.
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all five elements of this offense have
been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1322A (2018). Release No. 56, 7/2018. © 2018, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
1e92abc3bfe1ff65ed1ce8a3157cec0cf914f7d62074f72a9198bcfd5a8409c0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.