WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1320
Endangering Safety by Use of a Dangerous Weapon: Negligent Operation or Handling
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, as defined in § 941.20(1)(a) of the
Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who endangers another's safety by the
negligent operation or handling of a dangerous weapon.
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant operated or handled a dangerous weapon.
2. The defendant operated or handled a dangerous weapon in a manner constituting
criminal negligence.
3. The defendant's operation or handling of a dangerous weapon in a criminally
negligent manner endangered the safety of another.
Meaning of "Dangerous Weapon"
"Dangerous weapon" means 1
[any firearm, whether loaded or unloaded. A firearm is a weapon that acts by force
of gunpowder.]
[any device designed as a weapon and capable of producing death or great bodily harm.
"Great bodily harm" means serious bodily injury. 2]
[any device or instrumentality which, in the manner it is used or intended to be used, is
likely to produce death or great bodily harm. 3 "Great bodily harm" means serious
bodily injury. 4]
[any electric weapon. An electric weapon is a device designed or used to immobilize or
incapacitate a person by the use of electric current.]
Meaning of "Criminal Negligence"
"Criminal negligence" means: 5
• the defendant's operation or handling of a dangerous weapon created a risk of death
or great bodily harm; and
• the risk of death or great bodily harm was unreasonable and substantial; and
• the defendant should have been aware that (his) (her) operation or handling of a
dangerous weapon created the unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great
bodily harm.
[IF REFERENCE TO ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE IS BELIEVED TO BE
HELPFUL OR NECESSARY SEE WIS JI-CRIMINAL 925.] 6
Jury's Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense have
been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1320 (2005). Release No. 43, 5/2005. © 2005, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8bac2ac7af514add021690c7a0cb97595b666229c7c336627cae8cae00e12f7a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.