Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1320

Endangering Safety by Use of a Dangerous Weapon: Negligent Operation or Handling

activein force · 2005-05-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, as defined in § 941.20(1)(a) of the

Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who endangers another's safety by the

negligent operation or handling of a dangerous weapon.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following three elements

were present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant operated or handled a dangerous weapon.

2. The defendant operated or handled a dangerous weapon in a manner constituting

criminal negligence.

3. The defendant's operation or handling of a dangerous weapon in a criminally

negligent manner endangered the safety of another.

Meaning of "Dangerous Weapon"

"Dangerous weapon" means 1

[any firearm, whether loaded or unloaded. A firearm is a weapon that acts by force

of gunpowder.]

[any device designed as a weapon and capable of producing death or great bodily harm.

"Great bodily harm" means serious bodily injury. 2]

[any device or instrumentality which, in the manner it is used or intended to be used, is

likely to produce death or great bodily harm. 3 "Great bodily harm" means serious

bodily injury. 4]

[any electric weapon. An electric weapon is a device designed or used to immobilize or

incapacitate a person by the use of electric current.]

Meaning of "Criminal Negligence"

"Criminal negligence" means: 5

• the defendant's operation or handling of a dangerous weapon created a risk of death

or great bodily harm; and

• the risk of death or great bodily harm was unreasonable and substantial; and

• the defendant should have been aware that (his) (her) operation or handling of a

dangerous weapon created the unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great

bodily harm.

[IF REFERENCE TO ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE IS BELIEVED TO BE

HELPFUL OR NECESSARY SEE WIS JI-CRIMINAL 925.] 6

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all three elements of this offense have

been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1320 (2005). Release No. 43, 5/2005. © 2005, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
8bac2ac7af514add021690c7a0cb97595b666229c7c336627cae8cae00e12f7a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.