WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1284B
Stalking
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Stalking, as defined in § 940.32(2e) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed
by one who has been convicted of (specify applicable sexual assault or domestic abuse
offense),1 directs an act of (specify applicable act listed in § 940.32(1)(a)1. to 10.)2 at the
victim of that offense, causes that person [to suffer serious emotional distress] [to fear
bodily injury or death to (himself) (herself) (a member of (his) (her) (family) (household)]
and where the actor knows or should know that the act will [cause the person to suffer
serious emotional distress] [place the person in reasonable fear of bodily injury or death to
(himself) (herself) (a member of (his) (her) (family) (household)].
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following five elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
1. The defendant was convicted of (specify applicable sexual assault or domestic
abuse offense).3
2. (Name of person) was the victim of that offense.
3. The defendant directed an act of (specify applicable act listed in § 940.32(1)(a)1.
to 10.)4 at (name of person).
4. The act [caused (name of person) to suffer serious emotional distress] [induced
fear in (name of person) of bodily injury or death to (himself) (herself) (a member
of (his) (her) (family) (household)].
[“Suffer serious emotional distress” means to feel terrified, intimidated,
threatened, harassed, or tormented. This does not require that (name of person)
received treatment from a mental health professional.]5
[“Member of a family” means a spouse, parent, child, sibling, or any other
person who is related by blood or adoption to another.]6
[“Member of a household” means a person (who regularly resides in the
household of another) (who within the previous 6 months regularly resided in the
household of another).]7
5. The defendant knew or should have known that the act would [cause (name of
person) to suffer serious emotional distress] [place (name of person) in reasonable
fear of bodily injury or death to (himself) (herself) (a member of (his) (her)
(family) (household)].8
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person's mind to find intent and knowledge. Intent and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant's acts, words, and statements,
if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent and
knowledge.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all five elements of this offense
have been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1284B (2021). Release No. 59. Wisconsin Court System, 2021. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
a2d0215c4c99e6ada3fcbc2575652bddf61170e9dd37919fb520d0e8ce519505
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.