Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1283A

Placing a Global Positioning Device

activein force · 2016-06-01 – presentas-observed

Statutory Definition of the Crime

Section 940.315(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is violated by a person who

places a global positioning device or a device equipped with global positioning technology

on a vehicle owned or leased by another person without that person's consent.

State's Burden of Proof

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by

evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following two elements were

present.

Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant placed [a global positioning device 1] [a device equipped with global

positioning technology] on a vehicle owned or leased by another person.

2. The defendant placed that device without the person's consent. 2

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both elements of this offense have

been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1283A (2016). Release No. 54, 6/2016. © 2016, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9fdf74ab38a46c5a62c34fcc5b09a93f74406844a7b1daa06296dc55b179004f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.