Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 125

Two Defendants: Two Counts

activein force · 2000-04-01 – presentas-observed

The first count of the (information) (complaint) in this case charges that:

[READ THE CHARGE IN THE FIRST COUNT OF THE INFORMATION OR

COMPLAINT.]

To this charge, each of the defendants has entered a plea of not guilty which means the

State must prove every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

[READ INSTRUCTION ON THE OFFENSE CHARGED IN THE FIRST COUNT.]

The second count of the (information) (complaint) charges that:

[READ THE CHARGE IN THE SECOND COUNT.]

To this charge, each of the defendants has entered a plea of not guilty which means the

State must prove every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

[READ INSTRUCTION ON THE OFFENSE CHARGED IN THE SECOND COUNT.]

It is for you to determine, as to each defendant, whether that defendant is guilty or not

guilty of the offenses charged in the (information) (complaint). You must make a finding as

to each defendant separately, and, at the close of these instructions, the court will submit to

you separate verdicts regarding each defendant.

History

Wis JI-Criminal 125 (2000). Release No. 38, 4/2000. © 2000, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
426691d876ff5b44a3397641c28e100fd47f803ff291def2e52bb2e3baecaa25
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.