WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1230
Battery to a firefighter or commission warden - s.940.62(2)(d)
Statutory Definition of the Crime
Section 940.62(2)(d) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is violated by one who
intentionally causes bodily harm to a (firefighter) (commission warden) where at the time
of the act the defendant knows or has reason to know that the victim is a (firefighter)
(commission warden) acting in an official capacity and there is no consent by the victim.
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following six elements
were present.
1. The defendant caused bodily harm to (name of victim).
“Cause” means that the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in
producing bodily harm.1
“Bodily harm” means physical pain or injury, illness, or any impairment of
physical condition.2
2. (Name of victim) was a (firefighter)3 (commission warden).4
3. (Name of victim) was acting in an official capacity.
(Firefighters) (Commission wardens) act in an official capacity when they
perform duties that they are employed5 to perform.6 [The duties of a (firefighter)
(commission warden) include: _______________________.]7
4. The defendant knew or had reason to know that (name of victim) was a
(firefighter) (commission warden) acting in an official capacity.8
5. The defendant caused bodily harm to (name of victim) without the consent9 of
(name of victim).
6. The defendant acted intentionally. This requires that the defendant acted with the
mental purpose to cause bodily harm to (name of victim) and knew that (name of
victim) did not consent.10
Deciding About Intent and Knowledge
You cannot look into a person’s mind to find intent or knowledge. Intent and
knowledge must be found, if found at all, from the defendant’s acts, words, and statements,
if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent and
knowledge.
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all six elements of this offense have
been proved, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1230 (11/2025). Release No. 69. Wisconsin Court System, 11/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
08379f859c5e665582cfae0cf8a269f718e058c07e4d5f929fe6083efb05b04c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.