WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 122
Two Defendants: Single Count: Included Offense
The information in this case charges that:
[READ THE CHARGE IN THE INFORMATION.]
To this charge, each of the defendants has entered a plea of not guilty which means the
State must prove every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
[READ INSTRUCTION FOR THE CHARGED CRIME, OMITTING LAST TWO
PARAGRAPHS.]
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (first defendant) did
(list the elements of the charged crime), you should find the defendant (first defendant) guilty
of (charged crime) as charged in the information.
If you are not so satisfied, you must not find the defendant (first defendant) guilty of
(charged crime), 1 and you should consider whether (first defendant) is guilty of (lesser
included crime), 2 in violation of § of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, which is a lesser
included offense of (charged crime).
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (second defendant) did
(list the elements of the charged crime), you should find the defendant (second defendant)
guilty of (charged crime) as charged in the information.
If you are not so satisfied, you must not find the defendant (second defendant) guilty of
(charged crime), 3 and you should consider whether (second defendant) is guilty of (lesser
included crime), 4 in violation of § of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, which is a lesser
included offense of (charged crime).
Make Every Reasonable Effort to Agree
With respect to each defendant, you should make every reasonable effort 5 to agree
unanimously on your verdict on the charge of (charged crime) before considering the offense
of (lesser included crime). However, if after full and complete consideration of the evidence,
you conclude that further deliberation would not result in unanimous agreement on the
charge against one defendant of (charged crime), you should consider whether that defendant
is guilty of (lesser included crime).
[READ INSTRUCTION FOR LESSER INCLUDED CRIME, OMITTING LAST TWO
PARAGRAPHS.]
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (first defendant) did
(list the elements of lesser included crime), you should find the defendant (first defendant)
guilty of (lesser included crime).
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant (first defendant) not guilty.
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (second defendant) did
(list the elements of the lesser included crime), you should find the defendant (second
defendant) guilty of (lesser included crime).
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant (second defendant) not guilty.
It is for you to determine, as to each defendant, whether that defendant is guilty or not
guilty of an offense. You must make a finding as to each defendant separately, and, at the
close of these instructions, the court will submit to you separate verdicts regarding each
defendant.
You are not, in any event, to find a defendant guilty of more than one of the foregoing
offenses. If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant committed (charged
crime), the offense charged in the information, you should find that defendant guilty of that
offense, and you must not find that defendant guilty of the other lesser included offense I
have submitted to you.
If you are not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant committed either one
of the offenses I have submitted to you, as to that defendant you must make a finding of not
guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 122 (2000). Release No. 38, 4/2000. © 2000, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
2641331100163a7239e3a719608b9aae4121ca70a4bec2529ae37ff9b9976fcf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.